Google goes to COURT in bid to reveal how government collects data as company claims it has First Amendment right to tell the public

Google has challenged the federal government's gag order on its internet surveillance program, citing what it described as a First Amendment right to divulge how many requests it receives from the government for data about its customers in the name of national security.
The move came in a legal motion filed on Tuesday in the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and was aimed at mending Google's reputation after it was identified this month as one of nine U.S. internet companies that gave the National Security Agency access to data on its customers.
Revelations about the program, known as PRISM, by a former NSA contractor has cracked open a broader debate about the privacy of American's communications from government monitoring.

Google has attempted to mend its reputation following the Prism scandel by challenging the federal government's gag order on its internet surveillance program
The publication of such data requests would answer questions about the number of Google users or accounts affected by U.S. intelligence activities.

But it wouldn't answer more critical questions on how much data is being disclosed, including whether information belonging to Americans has been swept up into investigations on a foreign targets.
'Google's reputation and business has been harmed by the false or misleading reports in the media, and Google's users are concerned by the allegations,' according to the company's motion.
'Google must respond to such claims with more than generalities.'
Google has previously disclosed the number of data requests it receives from civilian law enforcement.

Revelations about PRISM by a former NSA contractor has cracked open a broader debate about the privacy of American's communications from government monitoring

A company statement Tuesday said that 'lumping national security requests together with criminal requests - as some companies have been permitted to do - would be a backward step for our users.'
Alex Abdo, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, said all the technology companies should be allowed to release as many details as possible, and that the government should divulge its legal justification of the surveillance program.
'The public has a right to know more about the government's sweeping surveillance programs so that it can judge for itself whether they are necessary and legal,' Abdo said in a statement.